Yes, but the "GR86 Cup" is not classified. Nor is it likely to be*, given:blamkin86":1l3o2oom said:Just to be clear here- the production spec line for the GR86 is EP, not FP.
Greg Amy":aown8fj3 said:Yes, but the "GR86 Cup" is not classified. Nor is it likely to be*, given:blamkin86":aown8fj3 said:Just to be clear here- the production spec line for the GR86 is EP, not FP.
"The GR86 Cup car modifications include Bosch engine management, custom Borla exhaust, SADEV 6-speed sequential transmission, Alcon brakes, JRI adjustable shocks, OMP safety equipment, roll cage, carbon fiber rear wing, 22-gallon fuel cell, TGRNA designed MacPherson strut, Stratasys custom bodywork, a TGRNA designed splitter, and more."
https://www.toyota.com/racing/tgrna/gr-cup
*(Edit: sorry, it was quite foolish of me to make such a declaration before I checked first to see if any of the rulesmakers have a buddy with one. I'll have get back to you on that...)
SilverYota":s46f6o1y said:Does adding "Cup" to the name of a vehicle somehow make it faster?? Doesn't seem to work for Global MX-5 Cup cars classed in EP as they can easily be outrun by a FP or GTL cars.
https://cdn.connectsites.net/user_f...00/066/310/Grp 3 Sun Race Grid.pdf?1676216962
It depends. How good is the drier?SilverYota":1pqg2dvf said:Does adding "Cup" to the name of a vehicle somehow make it faster?? Doesn't seem to work for Global MX-5 Cup cars classed in EP as they can easily be outrun by a FP or GTL cars.
https://cdn.connectsites.net/user_f...00/066/310/Grp 3 Sun Race Grid.pdf?1676216962
STU does not have car spec lines. The car will be weighed based on displacement and other installed equipment...harvey":2odzhcgc said:I got a response back from the registrar and the car got moved to STU but there is not a spec line there either that I can find.
Greg Amy":lr6jdey7 said:STU does not have car spec lines. The car will be weighed based on displacement and other installed equipment...harvey":lr6jdey7 said:I got a response back from the registrar and the car got moved to STU but there is not a spec line there either that I can find.
Brakes exceed STU limits by 1 mm, I don't think anyone will get incensed about that...18x8 wheels and 245 tires are compliant, though they'll need to swap to DOTs from the Conti slicks...rear wing might require the 5% "advanced aero" penalty...2.4L=2560 +5% = 2,688#, back-of-napkin. Listed spec for the race car is 2,770 so it should be OK there.
Hope someone either has checked the cage for SCCA compliance and/or applied for an FIA cert logbook. This is the kind of stickler stuff that gives SCCA black eye. Not that I disgree with it, mind you, but I'd rather have someone shepherding these folks through this process rather than their figuring it out at the track. - GA
https://www.gr86.org/attachments/2023-g ... pdf.15392/
that's correct.harvey":1vilt9yh said:Greg Amy":1vilt9yh said:STU does not have car spec lines. The car will be weighed based on displacement and other installed equipment...harvey":1vilt9yh said:I got a response back from the registrar and the car got moved to STU but there is not a spec line there either that I can find.
Brakes exceed STU limits by 1 mm, I don't think anyone will get incensed about that...18x8 wheels and 245 tires are compliant, though they'll need to swap to DOTs from the Conti slicks...rear wing might require the 5% "advanced aero" penalty...2.4L=2560 +5% = 2,688#, back-of-napkin. Listed spec for the race car is 2,770 so it should be OK there.
Hope someone either has checked the cage for SCCA compliance and/or applied for an FIA cert logbook. This is the kind of stickler stuff that gives SCCA black eye. Not that I disgree with it, mind you, but I'd rather have someone shepherding these folks through this process rather than their figuring it out at the track. - GA
https://www.gr86.org/attachments/2023-g ... pdf.15392/
I knew there were no spec lines but I thought the engine had to be listed but I see that is just alternate vehicle configurations
FP Racer":2wdu3t3e said:I sent the driver an email and told him he had entered a car not eligible for FP. Glad to hear he fixed it before getting to the track. It would involve way too much changes there.
kruck":2b3987b2 said:So about the actual event now...
...a nice Prod field shaping up in all three classes. 25 entries, and no B-Spec in the Prod group. Almost makes me second guess not going.
Matt93SE":126ur8bw said:kruck":126ur8bw said:So about the actual event now...
...a nice Prod field shaping up in all three classes. 25 entries, and no B-Spec in the Prod group. Almost makes me second guess not going.
Just wait. you'll get a couple B Specs and a ragged old HP that shouldn't be allowed near a race track without wearing a diaper. The B Specs will collide with one of the backmarker FP drivers and cause a FCY while the HP oils down the track before pulling in on lap 5. Half the field will be stuck behind a rotary during the FCY and everyone's eyes will be watering so bad from the fumes they will cause another wreck when the field goes green again.
There I said it. sorry not sorry.